<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nick Armstrong: Colorado&#039;s Storytelling Small Business Marketing Expert and Funny Public Speaker &#187; SpecWork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iamnickarmstrong.com/tag/specwork/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iamnickarmstrong.com</link>
	<description>Nick Armstrong is Colorado&#039;s storytelling small business marketing expert and funny public speaker. He specializes in creating funny speeches, revamping failing social media campaigns, community building, and creative problem solving for small businesses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:21:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Spec Work or Celebrating Your Audience?</title>
		<link>http://www.iamnickarmstrong.com/2009/12/spec-work-or-celebrating-your-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iamnickarmstrong.com/2009/12/spec-work-or-celebrating-your-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Armstrong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Gunslinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpecWork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subjectivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamnickarmstrong.com/?p=1248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Art is subjective; but taste is also subjective.  Designers have a responsibility for acknowledging both sides of the coin, just as clients have a responsibility to pay fairly for completed work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/meatbell/570601785/" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-1249 alignright" style="border: 2px solid black; margin: 10px;" title="Coming Soon - Slave Labor Bears" src="http://www.iamnickarmstrong.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/comingsoon-slavelaborbears.jpg" alt="Coming Soon - Slave Labor Bears" width="300" height="225" /></a>Don&#8217;t get me wrong.  <a title="No!Spec" href="http://www.no-spec.com/" target="_blank">I&#8217;ve signed the petition</a>; I believe that people should be paid for their work &#8211; carrot dangling is never acceptable.</p>
<p>But, when I read about <a title="Space150" href="http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/design_the_25th_identity_of_space150.php" target="_blank">Space150&#8242;s logo design competition</a>, it sounded to me a lot more like &#8220;we want to celebrate our audience&#8217;s work&#8221; rather than spec work.  Taking another example, is Mountain Dew&#8217;s can design campaign spec work or are they celebrating their community?</p>
<p><strong>Where and how do you draw the line?</strong></p>
<p>A big problem designers face is that clients -must- understand that they&#8217;re paying for art and art seldom comes with a refund policy.</p>
<p>Art is subjective.  The logo may not look 100% like what you expected, but that art didn&#8217;t just appear.  It took years of training, experience, and finally, a few more recent hours to put together.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the adage of Picasso walking through the park and being approached by a fan who begs for a self-portrait.  Picasso begrudgingly obliges and then asks for $20,000.  The fan protests, &#8220;But that just took you 5 minutes&#8230;&#8221; and Picasso replies, &#8220;No ma&#8217;am, this took me my entire life.&#8221;</p>
<p>From another perspective, you can pay $7 for a steak at iHop&#8230; or you can pay $20 for one at Brooks.  Cooking a steak can be artful &#8211; but if you (as the chef) completely mess up a steak, the client gets a new steak at most places.  Others, you get a refund.  I think the problem is that the client doesn&#8217;t trust (or doesn&#8217;t know about) your redo/refund policy.</p>
<p><strong>Art</strong> is subjective; but <strong>taste</strong> is also subjective.  Designers have a responsibility for acknowledging both sides of the coin, just as clients have a responsibility to pay fairly for completed work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iamnickarmstrong.com/2009/12/spec-work-or-celebrating-your-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

